Effective Communication in Health Care Essay Example

Effective Communication in Health Care Essay Example Effective Communication in Health Care Essay Effective Communication in Health Care Essay There are many different ways that that a Medical Organization could be ran effectively and successful. As a dental technician in the USAF the type of organizational model used is based upon the Matrix model because there is usually two or more forms of supervision that one has to adhere to be successful in administering and completing patient care (Lombardi, Schermerhorn, Kramer, 2007). To be successful at any type of organization employees must be informed from the leadership and be able to come to their leadership with problems or concerns the way this is done within the dental clinic is through group meetings and utilization of chain of command (Personnel, 2011). The techniques that have been most effective for sharing ideas and information throughout the clinic include weekly meeting and suggestion box, those that are ineffective for sharing ideas and information have been emails and meetings held to close to lunch or the end of the duty day. In a health care work environment some of the techniques have to be modified, because of HIPAA (Hartley, Jones, Sullivan , David, 2010). Technology effects the process of sharing ideas and information because without technology emails, power point presentations at meetings, and so on would not be accessible to benefit expedited communication. Within a matric model organization like the dental clinic in the USAF there are many forms of techniques for communication that are effective and sometimes ineffective at sharing ideas and information amongst employees to benefit successful patient care. Organization Model within the Dental Clinic The matrix model is the organizational model that is used in the dental clinic within the United States air force. This model consists of teams that work together with often overlapping duties in order to accomplish a united goal in patient care (Lombardi, Schermerhorn, Kramer, 2007). This model is really effective because in the military everyone has to be trained in every area of their duty title in order to be able to accomplish patient care whether someone is deployed, moving, or temporarily working at another facility (TDY). As dental technicians within the military answering to more than one superior is detrimental to mission effectiveness, there is a person of direct leadership within the part of the clinic that you are working and a person of leadership that supervises and rates on the dental technician exclusively. Sharing Knowledge and Solving Problems within the Dental Clinic The dental clinic in the USAF has specific procedures for sharing knowledge and solving problems within the dental clinic. The chain of command and group meetings are indispensable practices that help with communication amongst employees. The chain of command takes issue or information brought down by the commander (highest ranking authority, dentist) and shares them with those beneath him so that they can disperse the information to the rest of the group (Personnel, 2011). This gives the commander a chance to handle greater issues while the information is simultaneously handed down the ranks. The leadership beneath the commander often calls group meetings to address problems and disperse information the commander has to share with the group. Techniques that are the Most and Least Effective within the Dental Clinic In sharing ideas and problems with the leadership to the rest of the group some techniques are really effective and others are not. Weekly meetings and the suggestion box are two techniques that are very helpful to share information and solve problems. These weekly meetings are snippets of the monthly meetings and often involve groups within a specific working area working on a particular project. The suggestion box allows anyone to put any suggestion or issue written down and placed in a box and the management team reviews these weekly and discusses resolutions at the monthly meetings. This helps those who do not like to speak in open forums such as the monthly/weekly meetings to still have their concerns heard. Ineffective ways of sharing information are emails and meetings held close to the end of the day/lunch. Emails are sometimes not that effective because many people do not have a chance to read them more than once a day because of the high patient care volume so some emails may have delayed answers or information. Meeting held close to lunch/end of day have slim attendance because people might still be held up in patient care. Techniques Applied/Modified in a Health Care Environment In the dental clinic many techniques that share knowledge or solve problems must be modified or applied in a different way because of HIPAA. HIPAA is a privacy act enacted within the 1990’s that ensures patient care is confidential. Emails sent that discuss patient care must not include any direct private information unless completely necessary, and if so, must have a privacy act disclaimer attached (Hartley, Jones, Sullivan , David, 2010). The suggestion box must also not have patient information present because it is not locked up, therefore information could be put in the wrong hands. Technology’s Effect on Techniques for Sharing info within Health Care Technology is definitely an essential part of almost every technique involved with sharing information within the dental clinic or any health care field. Without technology tools such as power point presentations used at meetings and emails used to forward important information to personnel communication would be affected. Technology is ever growing in health care today and the use of electronic records and electronic appointment systems are often the backbone of any health care organization. Conclusion For the matrix model organizational structure of the dental clinic in the USAF there are many techniques that help in sharing information and solving problems some greatly effective and others, not so much (Lombardi, Schermerhorn, Kramer, 2007). The dental clinic shares knowledge and informs employees through monthly meetings and the chain of command (Personnel, 2011). Weekly meetings and the suggestion box are very effective at sharing information while emails and meetings to close to lunch/end of the duty day are not. These techniques are modified or applied differently in a health care environment because of HIPAA (Hartley, Jones, Sullivan , David, 2010). Technology has also affected these techniques because the use of technology via power point presentations, emails, and so on is the back bone of sharing ideas/information in health care today. Organization structure is very important and how information and solving problems within a health care organization effectively can greatly improve the overall goal of successful patient care!

Terms About Courts and the Judicial System

Terms About Courts and the Judicial System Terms About Courts and the Judicial System Terms About Courts and the Judicial System By Mark Nichol As with any government sector, the US judicial system is ruled by specific nomenclature that distinguishes one type of court from another, as well as other points of style: The US Supreme Court US can be spelled out, but there’s no need to do so should be designated as such, with the initials for â€Å"United States,† to distinguish it from state supreme courts even if only the federal court is mentioned. In subsequent references, it can be identified simply as â€Å"the Supreme Court† or even â€Å"the Court.† (Though court is usually lowercased in generic usage, the word is often capitalized in reference to the highest court in the land.) Although a state Supreme Court is generally so designated in local media, in publications with more widespread circulation â€Å"the California Supreme Court† (or â€Å"California’s state Supreme Court†), for example, is preferred. Not all equivalent judicial bodies, however, are so designated; variations include â€Å"Court of Appeals,† â€Å"District Court,† â€Å"Circuit Court,† â€Å"Superior Court,† and Court of Common Pleas.† Regional appellate courts are informally called, for instance, â€Å"the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals,† but it’s better to use the formal title in this case, â€Å"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.† Formal names of district courts follow this form: â€Å"U.S. District Court for the Central District of California†; their subunits are divisions whose varying names are capitalized, as in â€Å"Eastern Division.† Names of court cases are italicized, and versus is abbreviated with a v followed by a period: Brown v. Board of Education. The judicial system is also known by the terms judiciary and, seldom, judicature. The function of the judicial branch of government is to interpret and apply law, as well as ensure equal justice under the law; the legislative system makes laws, and the executive branch enforces them. The head of the U.S. Supreme Court is designated the chief justice; this job title is capitalized before that person’s name, but a generic identification, even after the person’s name, is â€Å"chief justice of the United States.† All other members of the Court are called associate justices; this title is also initial-capped before a name. A judge is identified by that job title, as in â€Å"Judge John Doe,† but remember that when a job title is preceded by a qualifying term, the job title becomes part of a description and is no longer capitalized: â€Å"retired judge John Doe,† â€Å"appellate court judge Mary Smith.† And how do you write the form of direct address of a judge? â€Å"Thank you, Your Honor,† equivalent to usage for other civil titles â€Å"One more question, Mr. President†; â€Å"Please have a seat, Senator.† Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Vocabulary category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Punctuating â€Å"So† at the Beginning of a Sentence5 Brainstorming Strategies for WritersPunctuation Is Powerful

Legalizing Performance Enhancing Drugs Research Paper

Legalizing Performance Enhancing Drugs - Research Paper Example It is about time when the law and policy makers stopped being hypocritical and paranoid about the use of PEDs, and sought their legalization instead. This is an obvious question. Why is there a debate on this issue in the first place? Performance enhancing drugs can simply be banned because they give an added advantage to their users. Then why are people objecting to the ban? Do they wish to be unfair? Not exactly. Banning of PEDs has led to the introduction of other evils apart from further aggravating their illegal use. For instance, while anti-doping policies in sports seek to â€Å"level the playing field† and prevent sportsmen from taking unfair advantage, they have not been successful at this attempt (Kayser, Mauron and Miah 521). Sportsmen who intend to use them do so without fail, and many go undetected. This proves to be unfair for those who do not use such drugs out of fear of being caught. This has not at all leveled the playing field, as illegal use of drugs is already prevalent among sportsmen. It is just that most of them are not being caught. According to Herper, to address the issue of illegal doping by spo rtsmen: The most obvious solution has always been to legalize those drugs that work, and to experimentally monitor new entrants, including dietary supplements, for both efficacy and safety. Biological improvement would be treated much as athletic equipment like baseball bats and running shoes. If these drugs are legalized, it will at least be possible to monitor the use of such drugs and even level the playing field as those innocent players who were earlier deterred from using them

ARABIC CULTURE Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

ARABIC CULTURE - Essay Example The Semitic people are said to have originated from the Arab peninsula, gaining the bulk of the people of Mesopotamia from the Jazirat al-Arab or the island of the Arabs which is the place between the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf (Goodspeed, p. 54). The Hadramawt forms in the southern border reaching northward to the east of the Dead Sea (Craig, p. 13). The non-Arab Semitic settlers were Arameans, Akkadians, Amorites, Israelites, Eblaites, and Canaanites; and they established their communities in Mesopotamia and the Levant. These people gradually came to intermix and intermarry with each other (Hammer, et.al., p. 6769). They gradually lost their domination of the near east due to internal issues. The first time that the label â€Å"Arab† came into being was in an Assyrian inscription of 853 BCE where King Gindibu was defeated in the Battle of Karkar. At this time accounts of these defeated groups include Assyrian texts which later translated to â€Å"Arab†. These people were considered desert-dwelling Semitic groups (History World, p. 3). War would later break out between the Assyrians and the Arabs during Ashurbanipal’s time. The medieval genealogists divided the Arab people into three groups: first are the ancient Arabs who vanished; second are the pure Arabs of South Arabia; and last are the Arabized Arabs from North Arabia who were considered descendants of Ishmael, son of Abraham (Nydell, p. 53). There are various terms used to define the Arabs, and some of them define Muslims to be nomadic Arabs, formerly nomadic Arabs (Egyptians and Yemenis), and the Saracens as defined by the Christians (Goodspeed, p. 56). The Qur’an does not have the term Arab, instead it uses the term ‘arabiy,’. After the 8th century Islamic conquest, Arabic language was defined as the pure and uncontaminated language of the

The Modern Prometheus Essay Example for Free

The Modern Prometheus Essay Such is the subtitle that accompanies Mary Shelley’s classic, Frankenstein. We’ve all heard of the famous monster created by Dr. Victor Frankenstein. But, not many know why the story is subtitled, â€Å"Or, The Modern Prometheus†. In fact, many may not even make the connection to the story of the ancient Greek god who brought fire to humans, his own creation, and was eternally punished for it. However, rhetorical analysis reveals quite a few similarities between the characters, and proves Shelley’s subtitle to be accurate. Both stories deal with topics of overstepping limits, harsh consequences, and lessons learned, which contribute to the overall theme of â€Å"don’t go against the rules of nature†; thereby validating the Prometheus allusion. The topic of overstepping limits stands out as one of the most obvious similarities in both stories. Victor Frankenstein was obsessed with unlocking the â€Å"mysteries of creation†. He expresses this by saying, â€Å"I collected the instruments of life around me, that I might infuse a spark of being into the lifeless thing that lay at my feet.†For Frankenstein, this is an immoral act that goes against all the laws of nature, as he is in no position to be performing this practice. He is overstepping his limits as a mortal by performing the action of an immortal; essentially, he’s â€Å"playing God†. Shelley uses this as an allusion to the Legend of Prometheus. Prometheus was affectionate of his creation, man. For them, he stole fire from the heavens and gifted it to them, much to Zeus’s dismay. Here as well, Prometheus overstepped his limits by taking from a higher deity, just as Frankenstein did in a different way. Shelley uses this allusion to show that both characters have gone farther than their morals dictate, both through the underlying theme of creation. Blinded by their ambition towards creation, they both went against the laws of nature; Frankenstein through the actual practice of creation, and Prometheus through gifting the fire. By overstepping their limits, both Frankenstein and Prometheus have set themselves up for some severe repercussions to their actions. Of course, disturbing the laws of nature has some pretty harsh consequences. Both characters endure punishment for their actions. After abandoning his creation, Dr. Frankenstein is tormented by the monster murdering his brother, William. Frankenstein finds this out via a letter, in which his father exclaims, â€Å"William is dead! That sweet child, whose smiles delighted and warmed my heart, who was so gentle, yet so gay! Victor, he is murdered!†Frankenstein’s torture continues as the monster murders more of his loved ones, including his friend, Henry, and his wife, Elizabeth. This ends up being another allusion to Prometheus; as after finding out he stole fire from the gods, Zeus sentenced Prometheus to eternal punishment. He was to be bound to a rock and have his liver pecked out. His liver grew back each day, so he would have to endure this for all of eternity. Shelley uses this allusion to forward the point that one must suffer for breaking the laws of nature. Her allusion emphasizes that breaking these rules are fundamentally wrong, and that the perpetrators must pay for their wrongdoings. Through their misery, both characters learn their lesson, with each character being tested in a different way. Frankenstein is put into a situation where he is asked to craft a mate for his monster, but at the last minute destroys his new creation. The mental suffering he endured from his first creation killing his loved ones taught him to think twice before tampering with something he cannot control. This too is a cleverly crafted allusion to Prometheus, as Zeus ordered one of the gods to create a woman of stunning beauty, who was also capable of lies and deceit. He offered this goddess, Pandora, to Prometheus as a companion. However, Prometheus refused this gift, â€Å"knowing only too well that nothing good would come to him from the gods.†He learned not to take any more things from the gods. This allusion shows that the characters have indeed realized that going against nature can only have adverse effects, and emphasizes the point that going against these fundamental laws is wrong and immoral. They realize that ignorance towards these laws can have painful consequences, and that it’s just not worth it. Frankenstein had to learn this the hard way, as did Prometheus. In conclusion, Mary Shelley’s allusions to the Legend of Prometheus in her novel, Frankenstein, are totally valid and both apply to breaking the laws of nature. Both characters were involved with creation and suffered the consequences. After enduring grueling mental and physical punishment, each character also proved that they learned a valuable lesson. We can see that Frankenstein is a modern retelling of the Legend of Prometheus. Time and time again, Frankenstein is tortured by the adverse effects of creating life, and learns that going against the laws of nature can only lead to pain and suffering. He proves this by refusing to finish his monster’s bride, just as Prometheus refused to take Pandora from Zeus. Indeed, Mary Shelley’s decision to subtitle her book, â€Å"Or, The Modern Prometheus† is appropriate and allusive.

Beethoven :: essays research papers

It has been called the greatest audio entity one could ever listen to; a song which can pierce the soul of even the most dedicated music-hater: Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony. Not only has it been designated thus; also, as one of the few truly divinely inspired works, one which most men can only marvel at, as they wallow in their appropriate humility. These creations, however, are definitely not the only aspects of entities beyond the scopes of men; there are far more examples, which are seen every day, but often overlooked. I was walking outside, with this song echoing in the recesses of my mind, on a dismal, overcast day in the Autumnal quarter, a day when where the streets blended with the atmosphere, when one could hardly look up without feeling the singe of the wind against one’s face. To me, these days have always conjured up images of some distant, looming storm, some silent tempest which, if not otherwise distracted will soon wreak mayhem and disaster on my environs. This day had an intense air about it, as do others of its ilk. This is most likely the fault of the storm under which it is shadowed, as though it and its inhabitants are uneasy and harrowed about the imminent predator waiting overhead to pounce. As the sky overhead swam with deeper and deeper shades of gray and hopeless black, the song in my mind was reaching some vocal crescendo in the fourth movement, a better foreteller of the gale I could not imagine. While the winds bullied and tormented the defenseless neighborhood, I started for my house. Unexpectedly, as the crescendo was losing speed, a quiet, pacific violin entered the musical fray in my brain, and the entire mood of the symphony mellowed, the winds themselves pacified, seemingly under Ludwig’s fickle dominion. Thinking the storm had passed, I continued blissfully onward to the meadows which were my destination. Again I was assaulted, this time by a different part of the symphony; not too long after the first chorale. This was the startling and almost fearful, but still uplifting, part in which the female and male vocals collided like two huge tidal waves with the power to splinter a fleet of ships with the German Alle Menschen repeated several times. Upon this onslaught of euphony, I turned from whatever I might have been thinking before, and looked at some violently twisting and rising leaves and other debris, and gazed at the playful heavens, again ominous. Annoyed with Beethoven and the cruel elements, I stood there, unmoving; indecisive, not knowing whether to turn around or pursue my present course, I felt the excited chorale still striking

Film Comment Essay

â€Å"Just too many ideas. I wanted all these characters, they all meant something to me, but I wanted them to weave together in some way; I wanted it to feel unified in the investigation† (Russell qtd. in Smith 4). These are the words of David O. Russell, writer-director of the movie I Heart Huckabees, when asked by Film Comment editor Gavin Smith about the most difficult dilemma in the film. From this reply, he was very much aware of the limitations of his movie, and is honest about it. The movie is not your usual movie-date fare. Yes, it is a comedy. Yes, it does have an all-star cast. However, this comedy is an existential one, a film that tries to discuss the profound questions of existence with humor. The movie’s protagonist is Albert (Jason Schwartzman), who seeks the help of â€Å"existential investigators† Vivian and Bernard Jaffe (portrayed by Lily Tomlin and Dustin Hoffman) when he is disturbed by repetitive, coincidental encounters with a Sudanese orphan. The couple starts to work on Albert; Vivian delves into his everyday activities, while Bernard tries to help him understand the interconnectivity of things. Then there is Tommy (Mark Wahlberg), the â€Å"other† to Schwartzman’s Albert. Meanwhile, the Jaffes find a predicament in Caterine Vaubert (Isabelle Huppert), who uses her charms to brainwash Albert and Tommy with her nihilistic ideals. The movie should be praised for having a profound and serious theme successfully conveyed in such a humorous light. Nonetheless, this is the very reason that hinders the movie to exert much influence on its viewers. It is too preoccupied with being existentialist that the characters seemed to be two-dimensional for its audience. The film is too caught up with its philosophical leanings that the characters alienates them moviegoers, even if Russell did draw inspiration from people in real life. When asked about Brad, one of the characters, Russell replied, â€Å"†¦your good intentions are staying in there, but you’re really compromising away half of them† (Russell qtd. in Smith 5). Too bad that also applies to the entire movie. Works Cited Smith, Gavin. â€Å"Hearts and Minds. † Film Comment Sept. -Oct. 2004:1-5.